🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an observance that was initiated as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has developed a commercial tone, expanding to include gatherings where Black people are paid to talk to white audiences about implicit prejudice and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. But even that moment has passed. The surge has peaked, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Month

Initially celebrated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was officially launched in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in February, but also in autumn in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Holland.

The month has transformed since that time, giving reduced attention to the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the way the celebration is celebrated is a manifestation of the political moment. How it develops is a instructive case in how co-option leads to erosion: the transformation of Black History Month has stymied the point of it, which is to confront systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Troubling Time

Little demonstrates how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the current time in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we observed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the UK's past. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a place where a legislator feels emboldened to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in parts of a city is a source of worry. Meanwhile, extreme conservative groups are surging in the EU as a whole.

In the America, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the country. A drive to erase African American heritage and narrative from the historical documents is in progress. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a organized and extensive campaign to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

Given these circumstances, the month represents how minimally it can be impactful if it is confined to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content celebrations of historical achievements, rather than challenging the conditions of the present. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is detached from the wider consistent effort that is required. Denise Miller, a prof at a learning establishment, put it best when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the celebration. “The difficulty with adopting a symbolic stance”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month turns into a transient display rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a treacherous thing. There is a temptation to just discontinue things like Black History Month altogether, believing they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an time that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and legacy of campaigns for equality – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an foundation that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed through the year (as some institutions are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) included in school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not avoid politics, and allows opportunity for citizens, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is simple recognition of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Organizations who celebrate it should not be reassured with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and awareness of minor insults, but faced with the threats that affect everyone if anti-racism is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, urgent, and responsive. Maybe an complete renaming is necessary – Contemporary Black History Month.